Asana vs. Trelo | Comparison of project management software
Asana and Trelo are two of the top solutions that often appear in the list of best project management software. And for good reason. Both tools share a number of critical features that any project management software should have, including task management and general team collaboration.
While Asana and Trelo technology teams are similar in their ability to help manage projects, they are somewhat different in terms of execution. We will compare and contrast these two tools based on key project management features. Note: For this comparison, we will dive into the premium versions of Asana and Trello, as they are recommended for team use. (See also our seat vs. monday.com comparison article.)
What’s the seat?
Asana is a cloud-based project management software that focuses on task management and team collaboration. The key feature of Asana is the ability to break down team goals into manageable projects and tasks while staying up to date on goal progress.
What is Trello?
Trello is a highly visual project management tool that takes core team projects to the center level. Using Trello, teams create Kanban-style boards (much like old school sticky notes) to take a look at their current projects, current projects, upcoming projects and beyond.
Seats vs. Trelo: Key Features
The best project management tools come with a wide range of features that teams can use to manage projects in their own unique way. However, some features are non-negotiable for any project management tool. For this comparison, we used the following key features to see how Asana and Trelo compare to each other:
- Project planning
- Task management
- Team collaboration
Both Asana and Trello enable the team to plan projects effectively. However, there are some key differences. As such, Trelo focuses on Kanban-style planning while Asana does not.
In Asana, each team has the ability to create new projects, which is an important building block in Asana’s workflow. Once a new project is created, the work and subtasks can be organized into separate sections. This enables teams to divide projects into specific stages or sequences depending on their needs.
Teams can view projects using three different modes: list view, board and timeline In the list view, tasks based on priority are simply displayed in a list, and on boards, teams can visualize tasks by stage. Perhaps the most effective scenario for project planning is the timeline, where tasks are displayed as a map, allowing teams to view a complete snapshot of a project’s life cycle.
In trelo, the emphasis is on the trelo board which is similar to the kanban board. Many companies that use this style of planning alone are attracted to Trelo for its effectiveness. Each new project is broken down into a single board. Within that board, teams can add specific tasks (known as cards).
Trelo also offers a timeline view, which teams can use to see project progress. Drag-and-drop functionality inside the timeline view simplifies the process of quick change in the project.
Both Asana and Trello enable the team to add endless work to the project. In Asana, these works are referred to as exactly those, while in Trelo, the works are known as cards. Both tools enable teams to check tasks, schedule tasks, and assign tasks to other users. However, there are several differences in power.
In Asana, for example, teams can identify as dependent on other tasks to better manage their workflow. Currently, Trelo does not offer this functionality outside the box. The seat also gives the ability to repeat tasks. And while Trelo Repeater offers this functionality via power-up (Trelo’s name for app integration), it’s not ready for use.
Easy team collaboration is important to move projects forward. And distributes both Asana and Trelo. Featured team building capabilities for Asana and Trelo projects. This ensures that the right people will see the right projects and works. Both tools enable the team to discuss work and projects, add attachments, and tag other users in comments.
A solid project management tool should offer third party integration to help teams integrate their workflows. Fortunately, both Asana and Trelo offer a wide range of integrations to choose from. In Trelo, these integrations are called power-ups.
Another great feature of both Trelo and Asana is the ability to create apps and power-ups using the API. For groups that require specific functions, this is a welcome option.
Seat vs. Trelo feature comparison
Asana Premium and Trello Premium have a lot in common in terms of price. Asana Premium costs $ 10.99 per user per month, is billed annually, and Trello Premium costs $ 10.00 per user per month, also billed annually.
Seat vs. Trelo: Which to choose?
The choice between Asana or Trelo comes down to the needs of the specific team. For small groups looking to manage a simple, visual, cannabis-style project, Trelo may be appropriate. Still, for larger teams who need more special features such as task dependence, Asana may be best.